Critical Reasoning – Concepts for Verbal Aptitude

Critical Reasoning is not as commonly tested in placement aptitude exams as other topics. However, it is an essential skill in many competitive exams and can sometimes appear in placement tests for companies that focus on analytical skills, problem-solving, or roles requiring a high level of strategic thinking.

In critical reasoning, students are asked to evaluate arguments, draw inferences, identify assumptions, and understand the logical structure behind statements. Critical reasoning questions require careful analysis and an ability to interpret information beyond its surface meaning.

What Is Critical Reasoning?

Critical reasoning involves analyzing a situation or argument and evaluating its strength, logic, and coherence. Unlike straightforward reasoning questions, critical reasoning questions ask you to assess the underlying assumptions, possible flaws, and implied conclusions within an argument. The goal is to look beyond the text and determine what is logically valid and what isn’t.

Key Components of Critical Reasoning

Premise: A fact or statement given as the basis of an argument. Premises are accepted as true in the context of the question.
Conclusion: The main point that the argument is trying to prove or assert, usually derived from one or more premises.
Assumption: An unstated idea or belief necessary for the argument to hold true. Assumptions are the foundation on which the argument rests but aren’t explicitly mentioned.
Inference: A logical deduction that can be made from the premises or given facts.
Strengthening and Weakening: Some questions will ask you to identify information that would strengthen or weaken the argument’s conclusion.
Cause and Effect: In certain arguments, establishing a cause-and-effect relationship is key to understanding the argument’s logic.

Types of Critical Reasoning Questions

Assumption Identification: These questions ask you to identify the unstated assumption on which the argument relies.
- Example: “Which of the following is an assumption that the author’s argument depends on?”
Strengthening the Argument: Requires you to find information that would support or reinforce the argument’s conclusion.
- Example: “Which of the following statements would strengthen the argument?”
Weakening the Argument: You must identify the choice that would undermine or contradict the conclusion.
- Example: “Which of the following would most seriously weaken the argument?”
Drawing Inferences: These questions ask you to determine what logically follows from the given premises.
- Example: “Which of the following can be inferred from the statements above?”
Evaluating the Argument: You may be asked to analyze how certain information affects the argument’s validity or coherence.
- Example: “Which of the following, if true, would cast the most doubt on the argument?”
Cause and Effect Analysis: Identifying if a cause-and-effect relationship is established and whether it holds logically.
- Example: “The author assumes that the occurrence of event X caused event Y. Which of the following best questions this assumption?”

Strategies for Solving Critical Reasoning Questions

Identify the Argument Structure:
- Look for the premise and conclusion. Ask yourself what the main point (conclusion) is and what facts or statements (premises) support it.
Spot the Assumptions:
- Determine what unstated belief the argument relies on. Assumptions are the gaps that connect the premise to the conclusion. If the assumption is incorrect, the argument typically falls apart.
Analyze Each Answer Option Carefully:
- For strengthening or weakening questions, evaluate how each option would impact the argument. Does it support the conclusion or undermine it? Be cautious of choices that seem related but don’t directly affect the argument.
Avoid Over-Interpreting the Passage:
- Stick to what’s given and avoid bringing in outside knowledge or making overly complex inferences. Critical reasoning questions are often designed to test your ability to analyze what’s presented, not to rely on outside information.
Practice Elimination:
- Use the process of elimination to discard options that are irrelevant or off-topic. This is especially useful in inference questions, where only one option logically follows from the premises.
Identify Any Cause-Effect Logic:
- Many critical reasoning questions involve determining if a causal relationship is valid or if a correlation is mistaken for causation. Look for assumptions that imply “A caused B” and test whether this holds logically.

Examples and Practice Questions

Example 1: Identifying Assumptions

Statement: “To reduce road accidents, the government has decided to implement stricter speed limits in urban areas.”

Question: Which of the following is an assumption made in the above statement?

(a) Stricter speed limits will result in a decrease in road accidents.
(b) Road accidents are only caused by high speeds.
(c) Urban areas have more road accidents than rural areas.
(d) The government wants to reduce pollution levels in cities.

Answer: (a) Stricter speed limits will result in a decrease in road accidents.

Explanation: The statement assumes that reducing speed limits will effectively reduce accidents. If this assumption does not hold, the policy may not achieve its goal.

Example 2: Strengthening the Argument

Statement: “Children who read for pleasure tend to perform better academically. Therefore, encouraging children to read more will likely improve their academic performance.”

Question: Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

(a) Children who perform well academically tend to have higher IQs.
(b) Most children prefer watching TV over reading.
(c) Research shows that reading improves language skills, which positively impacts academic performance.
(d) Children who are encouraged to read usually read only one type of genre.

Answer: (c) Research shows that reading improves language skills, which positively impacts academic performance.

Explanation: This choice provides evidence that reading leads to an improvement in a skill that directly affects academic success, thus strengthening the argument.

Example 3: Weakening the Argument

Statement: “Implementing a four-day work week will increase productivity, as employees will be more rested and focused.”

Question: Which of the following would most weaken the argument?

(a) Some employees are more productive with flexible work hours.
(b) Studies show that certain industries require a five-day work week for optimal results.
(c) Some employees are not interested in reducing their work hours.
(d) A survey indicates that employees are less stressed with more days off.

Answer: (b) Studies show that certain industries require a five-day work week for optimal results.

Explanation: This statement suggests that a four-day work week might not be productive in some industries, directly contradicting the conclusion.

Tips for Mastering Critical Reasoning

Practice Regularly: Regular practice is essential to develop a natural ability to dissect arguments quickly and accurately.
Read Critically: Engaging with editorials, opinion pieces, and analytical articles helps you practice identifying premises, assumptions, and conclusions.
Analyze Your Mistakes: Review incorrect answers to understand why they were wrong and refine your ability to detect faulty logic.
Stay Within the Scope of the Argument: Avoid interpreting information beyond what is provided. Stick to what’s stated and implied without adding outside assumptions.

Refer Critical Reasoning Questions here: https://www.learntheta.com/aptitude-questions-critical-reasoning/

Dive into next topic: https://www.learntheta.com/aptitude-spelling/

Practice